From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Aug 15 15:32:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA22619
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 15:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from news.cioe.com (news.cioe.com [204.120.165.34])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA22614
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 15:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by news.cioe.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) id RAA17377;
	Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:33:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:33:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Ames <steve@news.cioe.com>
Message-Id: <199708152233.RAA17377@news.cioe.com>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, virtualw@virtualw.com
Subject: Re: TACACS+ support over FREEBSD
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hello,
> I wanted to know whether FreeBSD has been tested with any working
> implementation of TACACS software. In this case, can you point me to the
> URL where I can get the right TACACS software.

I think that ports-current has a tacacs+ implementation in /usr/ports/net.
You mean tacacs+ right? Cisco declared tacacs and xtacacs end of maintenance
and only support tacacs+ now.

						-Steve