From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 12 18:38:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA8F1065670 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF6E8FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10283 invoked by uid 399); 12 Oct 2010 18:38:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.145?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 12 Oct 2010 18:38:47 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4CB4AB48.2050307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:39:04 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Grosbein References: <4CB2AF28.30309@rdtc.ru> <4CB3D6B6.9060001@rdtc.ru> <4CB409DA.1060705@FreeBSD.org> <4CB455D5.1080902@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <4CB455D5.1080902@rdtc.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2a1pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange resolver behavour X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:38:50 -0000 On 10/12/2010 5:34 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 12.10.2010 14:10, Doug Barton wrote: > >>> It's a pity if we have no diagnostic utility that behaves just like >>> ordinary applications like MTA dealing with DNS... How am I supposed >>> to debug suspected MTA behavior without such utility? >> >> Step 1, verify that your authoritative name servers have MX records in >> the first place. As it turns out, they don't. > > That is not my domain and I really don't care about > its MX records/lame delegations/etc. Ah. Sorry for the misunderstanding. > I care about my resolver behavior. Ok, well, that's working as advertised, so no problems then. Doug -- Breadth of IT experience, and | Nothin' ever doesn't change, depth of knowledge in the DNS. | but nothin' changes much. Yours for the right price. :) | -- OK Go http://SupersetSolutions.com/