From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 10:31:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96D616A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:31:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from hauptpostamt.charite.de (hauptpostamt.charite.de [193.175.66.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A06A43D46 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alexander.haderer@charite.de) Received: from postamt1.charite.de (postamt1.charite.de [193.175.66.246]) by hauptpostamt.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C3515C015; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:30:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from chaplin.charite.de (chaplin.str.charite.de [192.168.202.88]) by postamt1.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0860633AD; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:30:59 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.1.20040309192650.01ad49f0@postamt1.charite.de> X-Sender: afrika@postamt1.charite.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:31:57 +0100 To: "Shaun T. Erickson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Alexander Haderer In-Reply-To: <404E0713.9010005@ste-land.com> References: <404DFE56.6030204@ste-land.com> <404DFE56.6030204@ste-land.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charite.de Subject: Re: How do I add a local patch to a port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:31:13 -0000 At 13:04 09.03.2004 -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: >Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > >... >I looked at the porter's handbook, and it says that simply dropping the >patch into the files directory should get it automatically applied, but >it's not. The patch is named patch-aa and is relative to the WRKSRC directory. > >Suggestions? Patching the wrong file? Patching an already patched file? Patching in wrong direction: old <---> new exchanged by accident? directory for patch ok? shouldn't it be relative to extracted sources dir within WRKSRC? Just what came in my mind... Alexander