Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 16:06:18 -0400 From: Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ICQ Behind NAT (Was: question about 2 subnets on the same switch. ) Message-ID: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB440110586C@site2s1>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pardon my intrusion, but why is this so problematic? I've been running ICQ behind my firewall w/o any apparent problems. Maybe I just haven't noticed them. Also, on that note, what SOCKS proxy would you recommend? -Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas@hentschel.net [SMTP:Thomas@hentschel.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 12:34 AM > To: Doug White > Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: question about 2 subnets on the same switch. > > On 3 May, Doug White wrote: > > > > > I *HIGHLY* recommend SOCKS for ICQ. ICQ has such a twisted protocol > it's > > insane to run it behind a firewall any other way. I have it set up on a > > client's gateway and it works flawlessly. > > Thanks for that, I was wondering why it was crapping out > > -Th To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB440110586C>