Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:46:29 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sendmail_enable="NO"
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601031444110.525-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <43BAD3AB.302@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Doug Barton wrote:

> First, rc.conf and periodic.conf are totally separate, so having just one
> knob for both isn't practical now, but might be an interesting project down
> the road. Second, IIRC the first implementation of sendmail_enable=no did
> actually disable all of sendmail, but since people could not send mail
> locally that turned out to be a POLA violation itself, so the current
> two-stage system was developed. It's impossible to make everyone happy here,
> so I think the current system is a reasonable compromise.

No, you can still have *one* overriding knob to turn off
everything.  If folks want to enable/disable different
parts of sendmail, they can do that with the other knobs.
POLA says the one overriding sendmail knob should be
sendmail_enable.

-- 
DE




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0601031444110.525-100000>