From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 13:54:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0F21065678; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B778FC08; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FE12B95E; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:54:56 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: src-committers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:07:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p17; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201209051155.q85Btrd0032888@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201209051155.q85Btrd0032888@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209050807.32344.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:54:56 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r240132 - head/lib/libc/sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:54:57 -0000 On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 7:55:53 am John Baldwin wrote: > Author: jhb > Date: Wed Sep 5 11:55:53 2012 > New Revision: 240132 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240132 > > Log: > When WIFCONTINUED was added, the number of "first" macros grew from > three to four. FYI, by my reading the state used for to mark a continued process makes both WIFCONTINUED() and WIFSIGNALED() true. I think that is probably a bug, albeit harmless. We could fix it by explicitly excluding SIGCONT from WIFSIGNALED(). -- John Baldwin