Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:23:58 +0100
From:      Peter Edwards <peter.edwards@openet-telecom.com>
To:        silent <silent@security.is>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ptrace problem
Message-ID:  <3D064E4E.3060100@openet-telecom.com>
References:  <20020611175940.GA22937@security.is>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
silent wrote:
>  Hi!
> 
>  there is a problem in ptrace code or my understanding of how
>  it should work. man page says taht PT_DETACH acts same way
>  PT_CONTIUNE does, but when i try to detach from process with
>  PT_DETACH delayed? sigstop is delivered, and process becomes
>  suspended. Valid solution/workaround seems to be in calling
>  PT_CONTINUE with sigcont, and PT_DETACH after it.
> 
>  Example is attached. Please cc me a reply:)
>  Thanks

Does the patch in kern/35175 fix the problem?

-- 
Peter Edwards,
Openet Telecom.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D064E4E.3060100>