From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 08:24:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0693816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:24:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B581943D68 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:24:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0UG9MA0005583; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:09:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0UG92WA005574; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:09:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:08:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20040130160840.GB5544@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040130123606.GB36245@uow.edu.au> <20040130134041.L764@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040130134041.L764@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about cross compiling sparc64 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:24:57 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:43:55PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > SC>So if someone can point me in the right direction that would be good! > > I did > > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/sparc TARGET=sparc64 TARGET_ARCH=sparc64 make > __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null makeworld You don't need to use any internal "__" targets. Hopefully users won't get the idea they should.