From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 9 14:36:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D214016A416 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@bafirst.com) Received: from lora.pns.networktel.net (jor-l.pns.networktel.net [216.83.236.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9235843D55 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eculp@bafirst.com) Received: from bafirst.com (72-12-2-214.wan.networktel.net [72.12.2.214]) by lora.pns.networktel.net (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k99EZ21P086950 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:35:08 GMT (envelope-from eculp@bafirst.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80) by bafirst.com with local; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:36:15 -0500 id 00095809.452A5E5F.00000CF7 Received: from dsl-189-129-17-243.prod-infinitum.com.mx (dsl-189-129-17-243.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.129.17.243]) by mail.bafirst.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:36:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20061009093615.ik9e6k87k88kcggg@mail.bafirst.com> Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:36:15 -0500 From: eculp@bafirst.com To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org References: <000301c6eb6e$b49aeda0$0201a8c0@vaio> In-Reply-To: <000301c6eb6e$b49aeda0$0201a8c0@vaio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.1-cvs X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on lora.pns.networktel.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Greg's side note X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:36:41 -0000 < snip > > On a side note, > > The default block rule should match both ingress and egress traffic. > A system cannot be deemed secure it if implictly allows egress traffic to > flow. Makes sense but I haven't done it do to an ignorance of which unprivileged ports need to be enabled for things like skype, IM etc. Does anyone have any recommendations as to where a list of ports used by programs like the above can be found or a restricted range of ports that has worked for you? Thanks, ed