Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:28:25 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees Message-ID: <20210125152825.mnd4qhi4k23dy6dw@ivaldir.net> In-Reply-To: <3f2d08b2-2959-dd3e-89e5-895437e44040@quip.cz> References: <3ea16730-84a1-52ce-2251-bdd808fe5c52@pinyon.org> <4990d009-1962-62c2-3f4e-4f62fd03e26d@madpilot.net> <20210125141051.qheedhp76d2ha6zy@ivaldir.net> <3f2d08b2-2959-dd3e-89e5-895437e44040@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zmfdzfooygxzvbby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > On 25/01/2021 15:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:23:45PM +0100, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports= wrote: > > > On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > I am completely ignorant here and am looking for up to > > > > date advice on how to get poudriere to build and make > > > > available package sets from multiple ports trees.=A0 I > > > > see there is a port "portshaker" that seems to do much > > > > of what I want. >=20 > [...] >=20 > > > BTW I noticed poudriere performs shallow clones for git repos, so it = should > > > not use up a lot of disk space. > >=20 > > Why not using directly overlays, it will simplify everything ;) >=20 > I don't know if you read me reply or not - I am using poudriere with ports > overlay but have a problem with it. Poudriere options does not take overl= ay > in to account so ports options cannot be configured for overlayed ports > which do not exist in the base three. > Is there a way to fix it / should I file a PR for it? >=20 > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman Yes I read it and for sure poudriere option not supporting overlays is a limitation, and yes a PR would help to not forget about implementing it. That said most people aren't using poudriere option and prefer to define op= tion directly via make.conf for them overlay is fully suited, and avoid the risk= or dangerous merging of trees may it be via portshaker, or git mechanism. there are room of improvements for overlays but it should work in most cases Best regards, Bapt --zmfdzfooygxzvbby Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAmAO45cACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plr32Q/9F9Y4aWuLhjHQH/AHNEIEZq+9ms9bpzb/BB2CHR3Wr/htT2+aQWAtIvNB nmhTRhJ53k+DN6oKGyBV6Qa+tckHfqr8+vGc6XoLRTcjtAuIicxYDTpvOjEby69K 4wDx95jpxy92NAWZRmyeRVIAdnKop8VI06BuL6HfE93+bRAzPMMVs5L2U/bTZnCZ 4uDGwYShptXIc5GWwxMdx6+r9fxkPYS40OFDqc9W9ea4PfqIjoGc1JKT4MtInN7z xeCUw9TXX5/hYGduYq7vZvbp2FxBWeB6gvFAuQ2LlG9jX9uk8WJkzkc9IuGrkeMd Yk1StKAON6go517/g999x+n/MMEQfFoaucWV+84piz8qekE50ebd1i7RM8zFpX3r 1Qk5rvdBQEuQUh5lwZtHeNlM+5El/N9CdSc1DAF6H4kia9Y4maILyiGACgxs3eeK mG+TVsJAtiRHppPB1YfQBKENhLsGe8GLNcDFrOGPP2OE9PZ0lrtYW6mKrT7sHqFk 0JlytVvaKPSWNW6sfs+szRYUkjGJb6cvmDc32GN0aed8x86ix4WfbOkyfmHLYhCU NcMR2dSI9rqbW2xQI8SFR3/F6ot9kfFzarjZ21KHbE4W6U5pebd+ljGVLON4FRCg WPxtY8r+VPr6oQLEiZDbQPzXnztI/pkyob97UpAKl2VFaEPjQTE= =ijUq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zmfdzfooygxzvbby--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210125152825.mnd4qhi4k23dy6dw>