From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 25 22:23:48 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9141C10656C1;
	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:23:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:23:30 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200903251823.40899.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:23:50 -0000

On Wednesday 25 March 2009 05:22 pm, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 3/11/09, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in next
> > few days unless a showstopper is found or "over-my-dead-body"
> > type of review is received. ;-)
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff
> >
> > FYI, it was originally posted here:
> >
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim
> >
> > and here:
> >
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim
> >
> > Please read the original threads for more information about the
> > patch.
>
> Looks some of your changes makes i386 without ACPI (acpi is
> disabled; not loaded and hint.acpi.0.disabled=1) fail to reboot.
>
> It this already known/documented behavior?

Huh?  No, it is totally unexpected because I didn't touch non-ACPI 
path for i386.  Can you back out r189903, r190339, r190340 and test 
again?

Jung-uk Kim