Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:38:24 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> Cc: pj@smo.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about creating an office team Message-ID: <3f5f8eb00f7c2b36d72aa77352f91a81@etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20110719.102138.1898388363586174183.chat95@mac.com> References: <62e0dab95bb3f29cb251a2c034f4c938@etoilebsd.net> <4E205E5C.1080800@smo.de> <20110719.102138.1898388363586174183.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:21:38 +0900 (JST), Maho NAKATA wrote: > From: Philipp Ost <pj@smo.de> > Subject: Re: What about creating an office team > Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:35:56 +0200 > >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> [...] >>> maybe many more? (you can propose your candidate here :)) >> >> What about math/gnumeric? It's a nice, lightweight spreadsheet if >> one >> doesn't want the `bloat' that is open-/libreoffice. > :-) >> Good luck with your project! > > I think "openoffice@FreeBSD.org" is sufficient, but I don't object > for creating a new ML so that it treats all office suites. > thanks > -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO > http://ja.openoffice.org/ > http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: > http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt I agree expect that in people's mind openoffice@ will remain for openoffice I having a generic name is better. Maybe I'm wrong. regards, Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3f5f8eb00f7c2b36d72aa77352f91a81>