From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 19 10:12:11 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA3016A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 254DA43FE5
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:12:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 68600 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Nov 2003 18:12:10 -0000
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:12:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031119130231.8405T-100000@fledge.watson.org>
Message-ID: <20031119101058.M68443@root.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031119130231.8405T-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Updated acpi_cpu patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:12:11 -0000

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > Success!  The system rebooted without panicking.  It even came back up
> > > cleanly. :-)
> >
> > Good to hear.  I think Don has the same problem as Harald so perhaps he
> > can report on the patch.
> >
> > > In an earlier e-mail, you asked me for dmesg output.  I've attached it on
> > > the off chance you still want it.
> >
> > Looks great!  sysctl hw.acpi.cpu?
>
> crash2:~> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu
> hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0
> hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0
> hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 2902705/0

Ok, this is correct.  Hopefully SMP boxes in the future will have multiple
P_BLKs and/or _CST and we can have better power savings.

-Nate