Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:15:39 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union? Message-ID: <20040921171539.GA30996@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <ygehdprh7m0.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org> References: <200409200250.49518.max@love2party.net> <20040921100220.GC842@empiric.icir.org> <20040921161420.GA17290@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <ygehdprh7m0.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:09:11AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, >=20 > >>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700 > >>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> said: >=20 > brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a > brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actua= lly > brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be= the > brooks> best approach. >=20 > I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union. Oops, you are correct, it's part of fastipsec, not KAME. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBUGG7XY6L6fI4GtQRAmuhAJ9RmMTuSRuAs9YIhRNJ55xq0k1KgwCfY/y3 zqiSVO6mzuxWu2C7MB4GKi8= =lDSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040921171539.GA30996>