Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:09:22 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why BIND and sendmail installed by default? Message-ID: <87y93kd0st.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <1598.192.168.0.4.1047484743.squirrel@mail.linopryne.com> ("Jorge Mario G."'s message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:59:03 -0500 (EST)") References: <1598.192.168.0.4.1047484743.squirrel@mail.linopryne.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-03-12T15:59:03Z, "Jorge Mario G." <list@linopryne.com> writes: > I've seen that BIND and sendmail (till 4.7-RELEASE havent tested 5.0 yet) > are installed by default my question is simple... WHY? Because noone's done the work of removing them. Volunteering? > I see this from a end user point of view (mine): > > Do I need a my own mailserver??? > - No, we have yahoo.com :-) So, you're OK with setting your nightly periodic output to be sent through yahoo.com? What if you're systems trying to tell you that there's a network outage, but can't because, well, there's a network outage? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+b1u15sRg+Y0CpvERAtmSAJ9jnLTyZ/RP2r0+76AA/6s+aUlGTQCeLur9 EmW4Js+myitd03v56b1CwCo= =Ps1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87y93kd0st.fsf>