From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 12:47:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF9937B404 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlasta.net (wow.atlasta.net [12.129.13.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 521AD43F93 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 12:47:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drais@wow.atlasta.net) Received: (qmail 37988 invoked by uid 1068); 29 May 2003 19:47:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2003 19:47:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 12:47:45 -0700 (PDT) From: David Raistrick To: Christoffer Pio In-Reply-To: <3ED1EFF1.C675DAD2@cvt.dk> Message-ID: References: <3ED1EFF1.C675DAD2@cvt.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spooky em INTEL PRO 1000 driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 19:47:48 -0000 On Mon, 26 May 2003, Christoffer Pio wrote: > x345 2U machine; the x345 comes with two on-board INTEL 100/1000 mb nics > which uses the em driver. However, whenever I "up" one of the nics, > there is a slight delay of a few seconds before the command > completes, also the nic is not operating in up state yet, > appr. 30 seconds passes before traffic actually can pass FWIW, I've seen this every time I up or down an em nic, with every em-supported card I've tested. (and every version of em since the first up through 4.8-R or so. ) No testing lately, though. ...david --- david raistrick drais@atlasta.net http://www.expita.com/nomime.html