From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 11 16:35:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AD516A41F for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FABC43D68 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so198828wra for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:35:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=U5B1/bvpMBcgMc7qayA/kpTMBdcXZGOvkBIz//fF81iRDe8pKcPZN2MkZOLs/dbkgtAP4UhSur4QZHKbZI7qQPTN5g9wb3rfitgaoUvIf8Ub7KUWAqWmB59G6To2hKHqY0MpO8+Wod2EEFnKuWRVj7fJmEKUlGkIEOrQyn9NsCo= Received: by 10.54.160.9 with SMTP id i9mr1697657wre; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:35:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 14sm2338292wrl.2005.11.11.08.35.39; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:35:40 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:26:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43726E40.3090701@iaces.com> <200511110729.36677.ringworm01@gmail.com> <44wtjfcfgz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44wtjfcfgz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511110826.14710.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome-upgrade.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:44 -0000 On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Michael C. Shultz" writes: > > Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to keep > > it that way. > > It's not necessary to consider that an issue: this functionality is > really only useful to someone who has had portupgrade installed > anyway. I just thought of that, thanks for confirming :) -Mike