From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 3 14: 9:26 2001 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 3 14:09:25 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548A237B402 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f03M9KN84700; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:09:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200101032209.f03M9KN84700@iguana.aciri.org> Subject: Re: Dummynet problem In-Reply-To: <87n1d81k8s.fsf@pf39.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl> from Slawek Zak at "Jan 3, 2001 8:57:55 pm" To: zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl (Slawek Zak) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:09:20 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: rizzo@iguana.aciri.org Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Well. It is not the case I think. Both transfers were for big files (~200MB > each). I've zeroed the counters after start. Measurments are acuurate according > to both rules as well as lftp status messages. actually the counters you sent me only showed some 300Kbytes per transfer (which amount to 40s at the speed you mention -- a time which is quite short considering queueing delays etc, at those speeds), and the throughput indications from *ftp counters are not always accurate. please check again your setup. As i said, i tried a config with different weights, and it did what it was supposed to do. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message