From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Oct 1 01:34:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA12358 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 01:34:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA12350 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA00888; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 18:34:02 +1000 Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 18:34:02 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199810010834.SAA00888@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru Subject: Re: bin/7575: flex has inconsistency in the location of FlexLexer.h. Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Why /usr/include/g++ exists in the first place? To make it hard for C programs > to include C++ headers. A C++ compiler should have /usr/include/g++ in its > standard search path. Only if the C++ compiler is g++. >Our standard C++ compiler do. So, this is pilot error ;-) > > >Fix: > > replace all with in /usr/src/usr.bin/lex/* > > This is very bogus for other reasons too, and I may explain them if somebody > want. So, I plan to back out these changes. Does someone object? Not me. > > (or revert the location of FlexLexer.h to /usr/include.) > > (This might be a good idea though, but I don't think so now.) It can't be right to put it in a different place than the flex distribution. This place is seems to be /usr/include. See lex/NEWS (news about Dec93 release). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message