Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:54:41 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP/To Gui or not to Gui [ Was Re: CVSUP Error: Shared object "libXaw.so.6" not found] Message-ID: <20020212235441.E29413@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <20020213070711.GA293@raggedclown.net>; from cliff@raggedclown.net on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:07:11AM %2B0100 References: <E2D6558ABE18D4119E720060084C966D0224642E@AURORA> <20020213070711.GA293@raggedclown.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:07:11AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> This change in the ports is really causing a lot of confusion.
> Would it not be better to have "cvsup" as was, i.e. without GUI,
> and have a "cvsup-with-gui" as the option. Many people do not run X11
> at all, so this would seem a more logical a way to go.
>
> I think it is called the principle of least surprise.
cvsup(1) has always been the GUI version by default.
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020212235441.E29413>