Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:59:42 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] Removin the old make
Message-ID:  <20150210225941.GU29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150210224937.GE58387@eureka.lemis.com>
References:  <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150210224937.GE58387@eureka.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:49:37AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 23:38:54 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for=
 that I
> > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the =
old make
> > from base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
>=20
> How does this affect non-system Makefiles that depend on pmake?  Is
> bmake completely upward compatible?

There are very few issues, not that fmake is available from ports, I think =
99%
of the compatibility are preserved I know about a couple of incompatibiliti=
es
that are bothering me in ports (for the infrastructure) but I would say thi=
s is
very much a corner case

Bapt

--O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlTajV0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyP+QCfdt0cIK357EaAD/cCWMCBs3KH
nEMAoLpV5H2BNrASUe7McksuZGAauuHA
=NOp1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150210225941.GU29891>