From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 28 9:25:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1969337B401 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:25:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (beastie.mckusick.com [209.31.233.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28BF43EBE for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:25:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com) Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.mckusick.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gASHPF59075306; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:25:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com) Message-Id: <200211281725.gASHPF59075306@beastie.mckusick.com> To: Daniel Flickinger Subject: Re: UFS-2 partition destroyed by change Cc: FreeBSD-CURRENT In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:39:23 GMT." <20021128163923.PyLY939@hun.org> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:25:15 -0800 From: Kirk McKusick Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I appreciate the offer to go through the whole upgrade process again, but I don't think it is necessary. If there were going to be many anguished folks that had to go through it, I would have played out all the senarios and made sure they worked. The point of doing this change now was to fix problems with UFS2 before most people had deployed it. From here on out, I promise not to introduce major breakage :-) Kirk McKusick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message