From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 7 5:38:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1A337B401 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 05:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F1043E3B for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 05:38:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.cc) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF91D; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:38:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g77CcMvd004561; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:38:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@madman.nectar.cc) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g77CcKNh004560; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:38:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:38:20 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Colin Percival Cc: peter.lai@uconn.edu, Anatole Shaw , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: advisory coordination (Re: SA-02:35) Message-ID: <20020807123820.GF4401@madman.nectar.cc> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Colin Percival , peter.lai@uconn.edu, Anatole Shaw , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020806140300.A24745@kagnew.autoloop.com> <1028312148.3d4acc54c5eef@webmail.vsi.ru> <20020806053237.A49851@kagnew.autoloop.com> <20020806140300.A24745@kagnew.autoloop.com> <5.0.2.1.1.20020806142610.01fe55b8@popserver.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20020806142610.01fe55b8@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 02:32:12PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > rather, I meant that once > everyone involved agreed that a patch was good, issuing an advisory saying > "there's a problem, here's the patch, we don't know what the possible > workarounds might be" Track the current security branch (RELENG_4_6 at the moment) and that is essentially what you will get. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message