From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 31 11:38:26 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16BE1065673;
	Mon, 31 May 2010 11:38:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BEE8FC18;
	Mon, 31 May 2010 11:38:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F399CB140;
	Mon, 31 May 2010 13:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz
Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id drbgheYx83r5; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:34:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1559CB1F2;
	Mon, 31 May 2010 13:34:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rdivacky@localhost)
	by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o4VBYubI044360;
	Mon, 31 May 2010 13:34:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:34:56 +0200
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20100531113456.GB42524@freebsd.org>
References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org>
	<20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org>
	<20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<AANLkTin-gJ5ehBsIB3c7VCqdivsiKf3kZdwXkod6Lgsf@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100531112529.GA42524@freebsd.org>
	<AANLkTikYm7NMbpD9cKHrOIQIyKpVFVfcGsl93a2Mt5eB@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYm7NMbpD9cKHrOIQIyKpVFVfcGsl93a2Mt5eB@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to
	HEAD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 11:38:27 -0000


--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> > there are no known clang bugs (at least known to me) related to FreeBSD
> >
> > in other words - at this point you can compile FreeBSD with clang (both
> > in the version in clangbsd) and it "works" (for people who tested it)
> > on amd64 and i386
>=20
> I don't mean about FreeBSD, but about CLANG itself.
> It would be very depressing to loose many hours on kernel races before
> to discover it was a compiler deficiency, for example.

thats what I mean - we are not aware of any bugs in clang itself that
harm FreeBSD (on i386/amd64).=20

btw. there are 68 open bug reports against gcc 4.2.1 in gcc bugzilla.

--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwDnuAACgkQLVEj6D3CBEwFuwCeLq45CG/t6jfhQTkySYOyYAIT
E9kAn1snUSsdSVaU/qfBvYS8Uk9SGXv6
=yngc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD--