Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:34:56 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <20100531113456.GB42524@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYm7NMbpD9cKHrOIQIyKpVFVfcGsl93a2Mt5eB@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <AANLkTin-gJ5ehBsIB3c7VCqdivsiKf3kZdwXkod6Lgsf@mail.gmail.com> <20100531112529.GA42524@freebsd.org> <AANLkTikYm7NMbpD9cKHrOIQIyKpVFVfcGsl93a2Mt5eB@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > there are no known clang bugs (at least known to me) related to FreeBSD > > > > in other words - at this point you can compile FreeBSD with clang (both > > in the version in clangbsd) and it "works" (for people who tested it) > > on amd64 and i386 >=20 > I don't mean about FreeBSD, but about CLANG itself. > It would be very depressing to loose many hours on kernel races before > to discover it was a compiler deficiency, for example. thats what I mean - we are not aware of any bugs in clang itself that harm FreeBSD (on i386/amd64).=20 btw. there are 68 open bug reports against gcc 4.2.1 in gcc bugzilla. --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwDnuAACgkQLVEj6D3CBEwFuwCeLq45CG/t6jfhQTkySYOyYAIT E9kAn1snUSsdSVaU/qfBvYS8Uk9SGXv6 =yngc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100531113456.GB42524>