From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 22 22:27:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE483B4 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0b:1:150:ca0a:a9ff:fef1:a4c9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E992D07 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanar.ci0.org (pluxor@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9MMRVK7063687; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:27:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r9MMRVUe063686; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:27:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:27:31 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: Andrew Turner Subject: Re: AVILA kernel Message-ID: <20131022222731.GA63670@ci0.org> References: <20131022215744.GA63463@ci0.org> <20131022232323.35652386@bender.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131022232323.35652386@bender.Home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Berislav Purgar , "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:27:57 -0000 On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:23:23PM +0100, Andrew Turner wrote: > On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:57:45 +0200 > Olivier Houchard wrote: > > The only thing I can think of, on top of my mind, is I'm still using > > gcc to compile my kernels, and you may be using clang. As I don't > > think clang has been tested much with big-endian arm, maybe there're > > a few issues there. If you're using it, can you try to switch to gcc > > to see if it is any better ? > > Clang has no support for big-endian ARM. There is someone working on > it, but last time I looked it was not upstreamed. Then I guess it rules out a potential clang problem. I'm quite at a loss as to why it would work for me, and am quite interested in hearing if my kernel works for Berislav or not. Olivier