From owner-freebsd-emulation  Tue Feb 25 04:04:38 1997
Return-Path: <owner-emulation>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA18034
          for emulation-outgoing; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 04:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tulpi.interconnect.com.au (root@tulpi.interconnect.com.au [192.189.54.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA18029
          for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 04:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from solsbury-hill.home (acc5-ppp16.mel.interconnect.com.au [210.8.0.144]) by tulpi.interconnect.com.au with ESMTP id XAA06621
  (8.7.6/IDA-1.6); Tue, 25 Feb 1997 23:04:23 +1100 (EST)
Received: from solsbury-hill.home (localhost.home [127.0.0.1]) by solsbury-hill.home (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA00748; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:16:22 +1100 (EST)
Message-Id: <199702242116.IAA00748@solsbury-hill.home>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96
From: Joel Sutton <suttonj@interconnect.com.au>
To: emulation@freebsd.org
cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Subject: Printing with pcemu1.93pre
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:16:21 +1100
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi there,

Has anyone done any work on direct printing since 1.93pre ???

I've got lpt output coming to stdout of the xterm I start pcemu in so 
far but I don't want to "re-invent the wheel" if someone else has 
already done some work...

Would lpr or direct /dev/lpt[n] access be preferred by anyone? Or 
perhaps both (a'la doscmd) ??? 

Cheers, Joel...