Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:54:24 -0500 From: boxend@swbell.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Senator Santorum Message-ID: <3EB91010.27860.15329FD@localhost>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Who knows does not matter, adultery is adultery.
We may accept it as a fact of life today but it's still the same thing.
Etymology: Middle English, alteration of avoutrie, from Middle French, from
Latin adulterium, from adulter adulterer, back-formation from adulterare
Date: 15th century
: voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than
his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband;
also : an act of adultery
Bottom of Form 0
Snip Snip
>No, he need not be. He might be a polyamorist. After all, its not adultry
>if the other half of the marriage knows and agrees to it, unless you take
>some odd defintion of adultry.
>
> Colin Percival
>
-- "Dovie'andi se Tovya Sagain"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EB91010.27860.15329FD>