From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 21 05:37:42 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA28573
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 05:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA28565
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 05:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id MAA02158; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:44:00 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199809211044.MAA02158@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ?
To: ark@eltex.ru
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:44:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: oppermann@pipeline.ch, easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu, kev@lab321.ru,
        mike@smith.net.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ipfilter@postbox.anu.edu.au
In-Reply-To: <199809211126.PAA00225@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> from "ark@eltex.ru" at Sep 21, 98 03:25:44 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Ok, it patches _all_ network interface drivers instead of working with
> ip-level modules.. I definitely _do_not_want_ a thing like this to be
> in my kernel..

ALTQ has to do this for the way it works. If you don't trust the code,
fine, but then why would you trust other parts of the OS ?
Or is it just the fact that it is not integrated with the source tree
that disturbs you ?

	cheers
	luigi

> > > ALTQ is damn ugly. I'd prefer to see something like dummynet interacting
> > 
> > Please be a little bit more specific with "ALTQ is damn ugly".

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message