From owner-freebsd-ia64 Thu Feb 22 7:56:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F5037B491 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:56:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1MFral92635; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:53:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:55:33 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Doug Rabson Subject: Re: Oh what the heck.. Cc: ia64@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 22-Feb-01 Doug Rabson wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Well, I figured that I'd try to fix switch_trampoline anyway. I also needed >> to >> remove all traces of sched_lock setting from cpu_switch() since that is now >> done in mi_switch(). The end result is this patch. I have no idea if it is >> correct or not. Comments? (I still need to fix userret() to take a pointer >> to >> a trapframe). > > I haven't tested it but it looks correct to me. Hmmmm, ok. I guess I'll be a little daring and commit it. I guess I need to sit down and finish getting a compile environment (and possibly ski) setup so I can test this stuff, and so I can keep the ia64 from falling too far behind the other architectures. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message