Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:29:02 +0100
From:      Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To:        "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Kibana7 port status?
Message-ID:  <20200204092902.GC37073@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <3B669A08-0B3C-4A04-9DF0-DA9B0C60C9AA@punkt.de>
References:  <3B669A08-0B3C-4A04-9DF0-DA9B0C60C9AA@punkt.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> is there a particular reason why the Logstash7 and
> Elasticsearch7 ports were committed to the ports tree,
> but Kibana7 wasn't?
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237374

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237372#c30

from 24th of January says:

-------------
I don't see that we have a port of kibana7 yet.  I don't know if
anyone is working on that.  I found that it seemed to insist on
having node 10.15.2 to run, which was a problem since the FreeBSD
port is at 10.17.0.
-------------

Any ideas on that ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    Now what ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200204092902.GC37073>