From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 07:38:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B407F2BF for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7596A1089 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-149-155.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.149.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AD33CCFD; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:38:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s017boRe002088; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:37:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:37:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Stankevitz Subject: Re: uname -r: release level Message-Id: <20140101083750.3a3f6c7c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:38:22 -0000 On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:25:54 -0800, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Hi, > > I just setup my freebsd machine and performed a "freebsd-update fetch > install" which leads me to believe I am now running 9.2-RELEASE-p2. > Of course I wanted to see for myself using "uname -r" which reports my > "release level". > > "uname -r" is reporting 9.2-RELEASE which is not quite what I was > expecting (I was expecting a p2 suffix). That's a very assumptive expectation. :-) > That doesn't interest me too > much, but this does: > > By what mechanism does "uname -r" determine my "release level"? The information is obtained from the running kernel. If an update (towards a higher patchlevel) did not involve a _kernel_ update, this particular information will NOT change. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...