Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 01:08:35 -0400 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Scope system threads (was Re: PS_BLOCKED) Message-ID: <20030410050835.GA37060@attbi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304091424340.5791-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <20030409154739.GA41117@attbi.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304091424340.5791-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:28:22PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I built it just fine without modifying anything except -lkse. > You don't even need to change that if you just install libkse > as libc_r.so.5, but I'd rather test out libkse in small pieces > than to have kde blow up in my face :-). OK, this is good news. I put a lot of time in patching up ACE to work on FreeBSD, and some of my work also involved submitting patches to FreeBSD. I am glad that > And it all seems to build fine. Now, earlier in this e-mail thread someone mentioned that certain ACE tests were failing. Do these tests fail now with ACE 5.3.1? FreeBSD lacks POSIX real-time signals, which was very troublesome when I was trying to get the ACE Proactor to work properly, because the Proactor uses POSIX AIO + POSIX RT signals. I would really like to see POSIX RT signals on FreeBSD. However, since this is a threads mailing list, I assume you are more interested in the ACE threads tests passing with KSE. Are there any problems there? I am also very interested in how KSE thread priorities work, because thread priorities are used in the TAO Real-time CORBA ORB, which is built on top of ACE. -- Craig Rodrigues http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc rodrigc@attbi.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030410050835.GA37060>