From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Mar 13  9:29: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAE837B718
	for <FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:28:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA74100;
	Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:28:49 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:28:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200103131728.MAA74100@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: Racoon Problem & Cisco Tunnel
In-Reply-To: <000901c0abe1$8b73fe80$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
References: <200103131633.LAA73676@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
	<000901c0abe1$8b73fe80$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:17:56 -0800, "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> said:

> As a matter of fact, Cisco is steadily losing ground in the SOHO routing
> market.

Which is really irrelevant, since the SOHO market is not where people
will experience the drawbacks of NAT which could potentially drive
them to IPv6.  I would expect those installations to be the very
*last* to convert, long after large companies with more urgent network
design issues arising from NAT have done so.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message