From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Mon Aug 17 11:54:08 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809BD9BBCF5;
 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F6F1F3D;
 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1ZRIzN-000KLs-HV; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:54:05 +0300
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:54:05 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>,
 FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
Message-ID: <20150817115405.GL1872@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <1D52028A-B39F-4F9B-BD38-CB1D73BF5D56@cs.huji.ac.il>
 <20150817094145.GB3158@zxy.spb.ru>
 <197995E2-0C11-43A2-AB30-FBB0FB8CE2C5@cs.huji.ac.il>
 <20150817113923.GK1872@zxy.spb.ru>
 <CAF-3MvM8-+KxP3xr4vF2=c7o4vqCRdPkzQWjHLECzf3Jx8sqxw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF-3MvM8-+KxP3xr4vF2=c7o4vqCRdPkzQWjHLECzf3Jx8sqxw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:54:08 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:

> On 17 August 2015 at 13:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> 
> > In any case, for 10Gb expect about 1200MGB/s.
> 
> Your usage of units is confusing. Above you claim you expect 1200

I am use as topic starter and expect MeGaBytes per second

> million gigabytes per second, or 1.2 * 10^18 Bytes/s. I don't think
> any known network interface can do that, including highly experimental
> ones.
> 
> I suspect you intended to claim that you expect 1.2GB/s (Gigabytes per
> second) over that 10Gb/s (Gigabits per second) network.
> That's still on the high side of what's possible. On TCP/IP there is
> some TCP overhead, so 1.0 GB/s is probably more realistic.

TCP give 5-7% overhead (include retrasmits).
10^9/8*0.97 = 1.2125