From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 16 01:26:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A926106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:26:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2F7C8FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22094 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jan 2010 01:26:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2010 01:26:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=JjwxeGQ9YDExrb63qGViS775x/Gms6SyQSeYWRXMwvK0OmX22hSQ7FRs0tPPFX8IhhWBkuSqOVtNkLoVXVwzF44TpgDh65XwjWg2vmvdf/UUXXSMeq2jo1b6sZAkLvyB; Received: from [24.8.180.234] (helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVxQl-0007Ys-4Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:26:24 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:18:24 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:18:24 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100116011824.GA54772@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <225661.56209.qm@smtp134.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20100115212043.GA88211@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4B50ED69.9070106@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B50ED69.9070106@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Server set up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:26:25 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:34:17PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >=20 > NTFS comes with "NT" versions of Windows, that is, NT, Windows 2000, > and everything since then. W95 and W98 used FAT filesystems. Fat32 > was the default for Win98 IIRC. I know a lot of MS Windows users like to pretend WinME never existed, but I like to think those of us in the FreeBSD community take a more honest look at the world. Thus, for the sake of clarity: NTFS comes with "NT" versions of Windows -- that is, WinNT, Win2K, WinXP, and everything since then. Win95, Win98, and WinME used FAT filesystems. I wouldn't want anyone to make some kind of grave error involving the assumption that WinME used NTFS. . . . --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktRE+AACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWPtQCgrj0FJjC1osKNI1ZWJ/z8CzgP x4MAn0T1mw9CFvaTc7S14OPazERDaIJS =/9fJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--