From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 26 21:56:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AB2106568C; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5BA8FC2D; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com ([10.2.2.95]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7QLh4b8009014; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:43:04 -0700 (PDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:42:11 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090827.022654.83897589.hrs@allbsd.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IPv6 regression on 8.x Thread-Index: AcomctGG2+KuQIOdSmGgU9L06vz72AAIgENA References: <20090827.022654.83897589.hrs@allbsd.org> From: "Li, Qing" To: "Hiroki Sato" , , Cc: qingli@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPv6 regression on 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:56:40 -0000 Hi Hiroki, > > > 1) Scope violation in a simple global unicast address: >=20 > 2) Issue of subnet-router anycast address with a global address on > another I/F: > > =20 I have fixed the above regression issues last week, but due to traveling, I did not commit the fix until about 5 minutes ago. Please sync-up to "svn-r196569" and let me know how the patch works out for you. I have tested the patch myself using your examples and the patch produces the expected results. This patch also fixes another issue, and using your example,=20 where packets received on em0 that are destined for either re0=20 or em1 cannot get any response packets. >=20 > 3) Manually-configured subnet routes disapper on receiving RA: >=20 >=20 > --> This symptom occurs on 7.1R and later, including 8.x and > 9-current, not 7.0R. Even by doing a manual configuration, the > routes on the RA-receiving I/F can not be added. >=20 The new L2/L3 rewrite only applies to 8.x and 9-current. Since this symptom occurs also on 7.1R, and this is the first I heard of it,=20 I will investigate further and get back to you, soon. Thanks, -- Qing