From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 22:17:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA10D0C for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean_bruno@yahoo.com) Received: from nm47-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm47-vm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19B24281A for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.140] by nm47.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 22:14:11 -0000 Received: from [98.139.213.13] by tm11.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 22:14:11 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 22:14:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1383171251; bh=jpySV+U5lAvjd2NNi2vSmADnB7e3N5b2fzokZO6tiaw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer; b=vpcVdVi7zSVlms40npJcGKYpCD9Vxx9oZ/ZwHX71jvV6aDCDJzV3iEoYlsFT4YGs2gel6se2p1g20yTUiWZZahUWQjmsyxGBeyHNb80F0ICGAQd9LV6h9M639F5Y0eCVdrg2AV03L940U2RKi+wwgDdYHNYjIEIipFfPhEtRUXo= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 629119.95444.bm@smtp113.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: AVOCRQQVM1krX_uuWC37.vtGMSgFOXOpGKgiJngntFj2vFF sBCAP2ut_2GZaOFd0QqYbCChyE.wOJu5lnFH_MML5tCcDU5bw328QUT0CQQB IkwKTmjW3dMXZtXJ0lB5K4HSjZ_ycItJBPVWIhju.A2jvUss.SrQAjPut1pb 10JhBAB3yacP3Bh.mbUEVwjUPPp4eOP117XANRhh2Y5Li_HTJWDSienQMGKq 1ZDBDWv5iST3w3LgZDPWPmMUKEGpxwyUDlzkpSIPEkkfOPE3wy5Vg6GlAbF3 mP9hOvqTDMV5Qeopu_BvBtzZh9MhL9Y02DWlTkn63EZQkDeCG8heIowC8nBH S2TEDuX5NxkwyznN0vgxRw6tMdewv260YSM8RNEuxvkXxN51.lAWKyxGiH_2 n_tBuIT7NTlA6DriRRy.Y9GTxBRdwDVuESxlqgVnlxZ5RqkVyk89gmfeqGDi w4CpLivhZuK3hF7Z5vLPEog7iljLLLE6edw0TpY_OxrmCRFd2j680s.Pa.PD SBBaZHwVjFHXnvVxqS7_kxmvY0rsrn_XTPNWWmY2im2CHm_EdykVTSO_eEiP G5SA- X-Yahoo-SMTP: u5BKR6OswBC_iZJVfGRoMkTIpc8pEA4- X-Rocket-Received: from [10.73.160.242] (sean_bruno@209.131.62.116 with ) by smtp113.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2013 15:14:10 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6 times? From: Sean Bruno To: Konstantin Belousov In-Reply-To: <20131030202439.GD59496@kib.kiev.ua> References: <1383079869.59169.2.camel@localhost> <20131029220622.GX59496@kib.kiev.ua> <1383157189.1751.6.camel@localhost> <20131030202439.GD59496@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-k77gMKTBh7DBYVe66Heu" Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:14:08 -0700 Message-ID: <1383171248.1751.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:17:18 -0000 --=-k77gMKTBh7DBYVe66Heu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 22:24 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Thank you for the explanation. Is there a trivial way to abort > building > > all the objects or fail if one fails? Or is this done in parallel? >=20 > This is done automatically, no ? > Bmake seems to be more advanced in this regard, e.g. my parallel > kernel builds with compilation error in some module abort whole build > immediately, comparing with fmake builds which run to the end.=20 Yes, the build exits immediately if I understand what's going on correctly. My question was about building all six objects, shouldn't one error/warning be enough? Or is there no way for what I propose to happen? sean --=-k77gMKTBh7DBYVe66Heu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJScYSwAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaHTgEH/2NgrAB1cvNM9Lv63w2Fqk6W 8lqez18pfMF/XxXG5dGHZ5KVvgDELuYvBtvTCzw/ROIS9tCVjOBf1SGxVu8LIKSx q1NCmWvrugRrP9KONDMsKW1utrq6zIzrT24KDewGP8iGdtPC0eMvRxT+MwNDZhNV +P65DMwQ6kQuuKGnxjg3JuJWXNCQxDIWgZ/7yKDVXj1mT6mRGvpp+yKHMTgXPGKD pD+BnvNTvhWs/FZ0ESCKjwoKQcmYOT8tbyxEKupUtUPDt2xvbeuEwY5r53LkYy6q IGbL28a0Ylkae06HdClGjrMbjwpuS229lTLSsx3/WemF62VH1j0I9PDAww1vSCs= =GAXS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-k77gMKTBh7DBYVe66Heu--