From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 13 12:02:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45766D3 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mailch-3.name-services.com (mailch-3.name-services.com [98.124.252.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA37F20C6 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailch.name-services.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailch.name-services.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C70462D43A; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 04:54:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender-Id: 173.88.196.224 Received: from mail-24.name-services.com (sjl0vwsmail09.prod.dm.local [10.7.17.59]) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/4.8.23); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:54:07 GMT X-Pool-Id: 4 Received: from [10.0.10.1] (cpe-173-88-196-224.neo.res.rr.com [173.88.196.224]) by mail-24.name-services.com with SMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 04:53:58 -0700 Message-ID: <520A1E57.8080209@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:53:59 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: sysvipc only for one jail References: <20130811173341.6d1cb2e7@arsenic> <20130811173630.24ed528c@arsenic> <5209B28E.4000200@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <5209B28E.4000200@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Demelier , Maciej Suszko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:50 -0000 Shane Ambler wrote: > On 12/08/2013 21:39, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > While it is currently in beta maybe you could also try 9.3 and verify > that the shared memory update works or eliminates this configuration? > > If you missed the change, 9.3 is implementing shared memory using mmap. > > What 9.3 are you talking about???? 9.2-RC1 is the newest available. Is 9.3 a typo and you really mean 9.2??