Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:49:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237426] graphics/py-pillow: Update to 6.0.0 Message-ID: <bug-237426-21822-9wcKsf4nVJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237426-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237426-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237426 --- Comment #19 from Kai Knoblich <kai@FreeBSD.org> --- @Kubilay: Alright, I had got used to the workflow here on BZ to process fur= ther once the dependent bug(s) is/are closed. I created two patches each introducing a new option, OLE, that adds devel/py-olefile to RUN_DEPENDS. The second one also sets the OLE option as default. I'll let you decide what the best approach would be. QA: ~~~ Pillow 6.0.0 without devel/py-olefile: > 1111 passed, 199 skipped Pillow 6.0.0 with devel/py-olefile: > 1112 passed, 198 skipped I also did comparisons with Pillow 5.3.0 that is still in the Ports tree: Pillow 5.3.0 without devel/py-olefile: > 1 failed, 880 passed, 124 skipped Pillow 5.3.0 with devel/py-olefile: > 1 failed, 881 passed, 123 skipped The overall tests failed for Pillow 5.3.0 because there are incompatibiliti= es with print/freetype2 that was recently updated to 2.10 in ports r503401 . To be absolutely sure I also tested both versions with the previous release= of print/freetype2 -> 2.9.1: Pillow 6.0.0 (with devel/py-olefile): > 1112 passed, 198 skipped Pillow 5.3.0 (with devel/py-olefile): > 1042 passed, 198 skipped --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237426-21822-9wcKsf4nVJ>