From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 19 09:22:54 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703F4106566B;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C477E8FC0A;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:22:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
	id 1QuLI8-000P4o-IC; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:23:04 +0400
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:23:04 +0400
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110819092304.GB92576@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <slrnj4oiiq.21rg.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>
	<810527321.20110819123700@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1108190939340.93669@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108190939340.93669@fledge.watson.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:22:54 -0000

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:41:41AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:

> There are a few known issues in terms of parallelism -- one is contention 
> between the ithread and user thread on per-TCP connection locks.  Another is 
> that we still haven't managed to switch to per-CPU statistics for the network 
> stack (which is fairly straight forward in a specific sense, but we'd like a 
> proper abstraction for it so we can generalise).

After discussion in other place: may be perfomace improve if
application resheduling on the same core, as processing incoming
IP packet (hot CPU caÓhe)?

-- 
Slawa Olhovchenkov