From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 30 13:21:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEDB88F
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
 [188.252.31.196])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32498FC08
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:21:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBUDLQBg003199
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBUDLQaH003196
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 (CET)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:21:29 -0000

OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB.

FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes. 
basic operation seems the same.

Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would 
have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes, but how 
about performance?