Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB. FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes. basic operation seems the same. Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes, but how about performance?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301420030.3192>