From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 15 15:41:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA04999 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:41:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from frodo.epigram.com (gated.epigram.com [209.0.75.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04947 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:40:51 GMT (envelope-from brandon@epigram.com) Received: from epigram.com (berio [10.100.100.31]) by frodo.epigram.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA22739 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3535371F.B8B5EABA@epigram.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:39:27 -0700 From: Brandon Huey Organization: Epigram, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: root filesystem on an array? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG what performance issues are there when the root filesystem in on a RAID-5 array? i'm mainly wondering if there are performance hits big enough to lessen the benefit of redundancy. thanks, -bh -- Brandon Huey Epigram, Inc. bh@epigram.com +1 408 720 3027 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message