Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:07:11 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/rwall rwall.c Message-ID: <20020307120711.A62212@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200203071328.g27DSORV012664@grimreaper.grondar.org>; from mark@grondar.za on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:28:24PM %2B0000 References: <20020307131720.V99061-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> <200203071328.g27DSORV012664@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:28:24PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > This is by *NO* means more readable than the old code! > > I guess this comes down to an opinion, right? :-) There seems to be more NO's than agreements with you in this case. BUT that does not matter. We've operated under the "don't change things w/o a good reason" to (1) settle cases of opinion like this. And (2) because changing things too much throws away over a decade of tested proven code. This is something that should not be taken lightly. We hold our age up all the time as one of our advantages over Linux. However these WARNS/lint runs are making our code as volatile as the GNU stuff we snub. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020307120711.A62212>