Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:49:55 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Jeff Behl <jeff@expertcity.com> Cc: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: timing question Message-ID: <20010806144955.O85642@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <0307F3737A2AD511A42200D0B7A071919A402F@dopey.corp.expertcity.com>; from jeff@expertcity.com on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:49:05AM -0700 References: <0307F3737A2AD511A42200D0B7A071919A402F@dopey.corp.expertcity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeff Behl <jeff@expertcity.com> [010806 12:48] wrote: > please excuse and direct me to the right place if this isn't the appropriate > place to post this sort of question.... > > we're looking into moving to freebsd (yea!), but found the following > problem. It seems that the shortest amount of time the below code will > sleep for is 20 seconds! any call to nanosleep for 5,10, etc miliseconds > returns a 20 ms delay. are we doing something wrong? You may have to increase the kernel value for HZ so that you get more fine grained clock interrupts. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'? And why do my programs keep crashing in it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010806144955.O85642>