Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:37:58 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rten_Wikstr=F6m?= <Marten.Wikstrom@framfab.se> To: "'Dennis'" <dennis@etinc.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Routing latency Message-ID: <E6D22E487D45D411931B00508BCF93E75C0333@storeg001.framfab.se>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[snip] > >For sure the "de" driver might have its own problems, > >but i think a lot of packet drops also depend on the card > >not being properly set for full duplex (which can > >cause collisions and lots of drops). > > > You should initially test mono-directional in a controlled > environment to > avoid "collisions" to compare the true efficiency of the driver. Yes, that is what I have tested. One card just receiving and one card just outputting. Thats why I thought it would be good to have two identical cards. But the question is, will there be a significant improvement by using 3c905 + 21143 instead of 21140 + 21140? /Mårten To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E6D22E487D45D411931B00508BCF93E75C0333>