From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 13:04:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915C516A400 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from mail2.secureworks.net (mail2.secureworks.net [65.114.32.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5FE13C4C3 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.secureworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7068E17405; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secureworks.net Received: from mail2.secureworks.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.secureworks.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxXiv0yqeZ9A; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from descartes.internal.secureworks.net (mole1.secureworks.net [63.239.86.3]) by mail2.secureworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F81E17425; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4677D455.9020401@jellydonut.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:21 -0400 From: Michael Proto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070615 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rong-en Fan References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:04:24 -0000 Rong-en Fan wrote: > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > Is this still the case? I've been using a r/w nullfs for the last several months with no issues. Granted, I don't do a heavy amount of writing to the mount point but I haven't seen any issues with it whatsoever. -Proto