From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  7 06:36:57 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA3E16A41F;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 06:36:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from haven.freebsd.dk (haven.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D764E44444;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 06:36:56 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2])
	by haven.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388C7BC76;
	Sun,  7 Aug 2005 06:36:55 +0000 (UTC)
To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:30:37 +1000."
	<42F5AA8D.3060201@freebsd.org> 
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:36:55 +0200
Message-ID: <30016.1123396615@phk.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: putting HESIOD, Appletalk and IPX on notice 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 06:36:57 -0000

In message <42F5AA8D.3060201@freebsd.org>, Tim Robbins writes:

>HESIOD should be moved out of libc and into a separate NSS/PAM module 
>even if we do decide to keep it in the base system. With HESIOD out of 
>libc, we could then split the DNS code out into a separate libresolv.
>
>The same could be done with NIS/YP, which would allow us to slim down 
>libc by moving xdr & rpc into a separate librpc, and yp into a separate 
>libyp.

Sounds like a good plan...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.