From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 21:32:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A9D37B401 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 21:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57D3543FCB for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 21:32:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 90460 invoked by uid 1000); 2 May 2003 04:32:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 21:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030501.222120.22923934.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI 0228 import errata X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 04:32:14 -0000 On Thu, 1 May 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > Nate Lawson writes: > : On Thu, 1 May 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > We must have another snapshot with all the breakages that this import > : > caused fixed. If Nate isn't willing to do it, I would be. In the > : > long term it is in our best interest to get the issues resolved with > : > the Intel code. > : > : First of all, please coordinate any future efforts with jhb@, marcel@, > : acpi-jp@, and myself as we were involved in making the 0228 import happen. > : Second, I haven't seen a report about any problems from you on current@ or > : acpi-jp@. Please send in a report so we can look into it. jhb@ pulled in > : some local changes today which were missing from my import and which might > : address things. Please cvsup and let us know if it fixes things. > > Yea. Too many 'freeing free blocks' panics... It is fixed? Is acpi causing "freeing free blocks" panics? Does this behavior stop if you don't load acpi? > : As to your other point ("we must have another snapshot"), be careful what > : you wish for. GPE handling was completely rewritten for 0328 and gives > : major problems for people. 0424 fixed some of the problems, but like with > : any rewrite, there are still many that remain. It's not clear that 052x > : will fix them either but by working with acpi-jp@, we can each do our part > : to at least make this a possibility. We'd all really appreciate your > : help. > > Yup. I read the list, but have been burried until recently. Having > my laptop being somewhat busted somewhat motivates me to help.. I am tempted to say "it's good to have your help" but crashing is never a good thing. :) -Nate